(Total Views: 133)
Posted On: 06/30/2017 1:10:24 PM
Post# of 4940
Re: TheRealRFB #846
TheRealRFB. Nothing to do with hopefully - it takes as long as it takes.
I and Catpole are 2 of the largest repeat players in $DIGX who monitor it continuously between runs - however far apart they may be. There are others who I don't know who do the unexpected mystery buying - such as whoever was watching for the 2017 1Q filing and took out the 40M ask at .0004 in a single second the moment it came out and then another 40M in undercut ask .0004 in a single second when a few woke up and stupidly sold from .0003 before checking the filing. Similarly, there were the mystery .0004 ask buyers of 106M on June 15 and 96M on June 16.
I have my suspicions who put up the extra 9M at .0005 today. The same person who was the only other person bidding for .0002s at the end of 2016. He got 23M on a day I was busy on another stock and then stacked the ask at .0003 for weeks hoping others would be duped into selling at .0002. I and another took all his shares at the start of the the first run of 2017 and he was then left without all the way to .0006 so he turned into an iHub basher until he got back in and then turned positive again.
Stacking the ask trying to pick up on the bid is a dangerous game unless one is willing to lose the shares on a one-tick flip - they can get left without shares - or with a greatly reduced share count on a repeat run stock that can move 100% in minutes from this level and 300%>500% in 30 minutes to a day or so.
It should be possible to stop the iHub amateur bashers getting .0003s by continually bidding .0004s - the complete nonsense from "surfkast" about "going back to .0001" [didn't even do that at year end] and "insiders desperate to dump shares by July 1 at any price" non-credible and proved incorrect over a sustained period. The quarterly allowance under Rule 144 for insider selling is negligible in the grand scheme of things and it is easy for the long-term watchers to spot - normally at much higher prices during runs - .0010999 last time (and only then because flippers wanting only 100% stupidly stacked the .0012s) and then .000845 on the way back down (and then only after low level flippers panicked and whacked the .0010/.0009/.0008 bids).
In summary, now is the time for those who believe in $DIGX to get their inventory of shares way up - a few ticks one way or the other on buy price doesn't really matter to serious traders - denying shares to those that can't be trusted to trade them without ruining runs and then setting off the insider selling is far more important.
I and Catpole are 2 of the largest repeat players in $DIGX who monitor it continuously between runs - however far apart they may be. There are others who I don't know who do the unexpected mystery buying - such as whoever was watching for the 2017 1Q filing and took out the 40M ask at .0004 in a single second the moment it came out and then another 40M in undercut ask .0004 in a single second when a few woke up and stupidly sold from .0003 before checking the filing. Similarly, there were the mystery .0004 ask buyers of 106M on June 15 and 96M on June 16.
I have my suspicions who put up the extra 9M at .0005 today. The same person who was the only other person bidding for .0002s at the end of 2016. He got 23M on a day I was busy on another stock and then stacked the ask at .0003 for weeks hoping others would be duped into selling at .0002. I and another took all his shares at the start of the the first run of 2017 and he was then left without all the way to .0006 so he turned into an iHub basher until he got back in and then turned positive again.
Stacking the ask trying to pick up on the bid is a dangerous game unless one is willing to lose the shares on a one-tick flip - they can get left without shares - or with a greatly reduced share count on a repeat run stock that can move 100% in minutes from this level and 300%>500% in 30 minutes to a day or so.
It should be possible to stop the iHub amateur bashers getting .0003s by continually bidding .0004s - the complete nonsense from "surfkast" about "going back to .0001" [didn't even do that at year end] and "insiders desperate to dump shares by July 1 at any price" non-credible and proved incorrect over a sustained period. The quarterly allowance under Rule 144 for insider selling is negligible in the grand scheme of things and it is easy for the long-term watchers to spot - normally at much higher prices during runs - .0010999 last time (and only then because flippers wanting only 100% stupidly stacked the .0012s) and then .000845 on the way back down (and then only after low level flippers panicked and whacked the .0010/.0009/.0008 bids).
In summary, now is the time for those who believe in $DIGX to get their inventory of shares way up - a few ticks one way or the other on buy price doesn't really matter to serious traders - denying shares to those that can't be trusted to trade them without ruining runs and then setting off the insider selling is far more important.
(0)
(0)
"Per Ardua Ad Astra" - "Through Adversity To The Stars"
A very apposite motto for those who trade successfully in the OTC market..
All posts are my opinion - trade at your own risk.
A very apposite motto for those who trade successfully in the OTC market..
All posts are my opinion - trade at your own risk.
Scroll down for more posts ▼