I'm not annoyed by those numbers, heck not even the turds over there can annoy me. I just think they are misleading. Since Alan said 62% of yesterday's trades were short sales, meaning they were sold and haven't covered, I asked a logical question in my mind. How could the stock be up 17% if the sells outnumbered the buys by 2:1? Credible source such as Fidelity shows buys outnumbered sells yesterday, which suggests Alan's interpretation could be wrong.

I'm open-minded and if someone can give me a logical answer, I'll be glad to admit I'm wrong. If others think I'm a basher/short for having a different opinion, so be it. I'll continue to contribute to this board regardless.