(Total Views: 179)
Posted On: 06/14/2017 4:00:17 PM
Post# of 65629
Yeah, I'm sure it's right there in the 'arson investigator's handbook'.
Page 1. Be certain to jump to conclusions upon viewing videos of burning buildings.
As you could have read in the post you responded to, the Twin Towers did not collapse at 'the speed of light'.
Maybe you should stop trying to arm chair analyze while looking through that '9/11Truther filter' you apply to matters like this?
It's way too opaque to be of use to you.
Page 1. Be certain to jump to conclusions upon viewing videos of burning buildings.
Quote:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/06/14/gr...s-earlier/
"The Twin Towers collapsed because the aircraft fuel ignited the contents of the building and it was the burning of the contents of the building which caused the steel columns to lose stiffness. UK buildings are much more robust, or tolerant of losing structural capacity than the Twin Towers."
As you could have read in the post you responded to, the Twin Towers did not collapse at 'the speed of light'.
Maybe you should stop trying to arm chair analyze while looking through that '9/11Truther filter' you apply to matters like this?
It's way too opaque to be of use to you.
(0)
(0)
