(Total Views: 311)
Posted On: 05/14/2017 1:40:12 PM
Post# of 72446
Re: someconcerns #33758
SLC post on the kerfuffle LR raised about Lang departure:
slcimmuno Member Level Saturday, 05/13/17 11:29:56 AM
Re: zandant post# 181847
Post # of 181919
Fair enough. I've just seen so many Ee departures in my professional life, for so many reasons, myself having had to deliver down the "You're Fired / You're Laid Off" msg, that I'm not inclined to reading anything into it.
If CTIX science secures a deal with a Big Pharma, then they'd likely be bringing to bear the bulk of the Regulatory expertise as the Phase 3s are designed, ie, perhaps Ms. Lang wasn't deemed as necessary given the push to--possible proximity to landing a--partner.
Again, speculation only.
Maybe we'll find out, as you've asked management for a reason.
slcimmuno Member Level Saturday, 05/13/17 11:29:56 AM
Re: zandant post# 181847
Post # of 181919
Fair enough. I've just seen so many Ee departures in my professional life, for so many reasons, myself having had to deliver down the "You're Fired / You're Laid Off" msg, that I'm not inclined to reading anything into it.
If CTIX science secures a deal with a Big Pharma, then they'd likely be bringing to bear the bulk of the Regulatory expertise as the Phase 3s are designed, ie, perhaps Ms. Lang wasn't deemed as necessary given the push to--possible proximity to landing a--partner.
Again, speculation only.
Maybe we'll find out, as you've asked management for a reason.
(1)
(0)
