(Total Views: 371)
Posted On: 05/04/2017 8:43:44 PM
Post# of 9129
already been asked and answered -since bashers keep bringing this up, instead of just making a conclusion you should do your dd re what is considered insider info and what is not-that subject matter is covered by regulations-which i've read and posted elsewhere before - i dont have time to re-look up that info- babysitting the nonstop childish games here is enough- there are many things that would not be considered insider info-there are also exceptions to what would otherwise be considered insider info
so not every communication w a co qualifies as insider info- in addition such info usually has to be acted on in actively trading stock
this is a subject bashers love to employ against longs as an intimidation tactic
it is commonly known co's can raise capital via debt etc financing also-and when a co like nnlx trys its best to avoid dilution,as NNLX history has shown,it can also be inferred NNLX will try to raise money via the alternate methods rather than 'dilution'
'dilution' is also a loaded subject which bashers also love to misrepresent- selling stock e.g to pay off debt at a stock premium is not dilution- what is the difference between the co paying via cash or stock in such a situation-nothing except the co saved cash by issuing stock at a price higher than the current market price
logic dictates that the reason co's go public (w all the headaches and regs that involves) is to have the ability to raise funds via stock issuance (not just debt financing etc) until cash flow is sufficient- but when these co's issue stock bashers always act like such is some kind of crime plus dilution-
btw to the basher who said i was just an acct- i'm not an acct- thats just 1 of ca 6 degrees i have and it was essentially a command of the cult leader of the cult i grew up in by birth for the leaders selfish etc purposes- i hated accounting despite having all a's in it except one b- but not everybody is born to a playboy lifestyle- some are born to a life of service to save many lives etc
so not every communication w a co qualifies as insider info- in addition such info usually has to be acted on in actively trading stock
this is a subject bashers love to employ against longs as an intimidation tactic
it is commonly known co's can raise capital via debt etc financing also-and when a co like nnlx trys its best to avoid dilution,as NNLX history has shown,it can also be inferred NNLX will try to raise money via the alternate methods rather than 'dilution'
'dilution' is also a loaded subject which bashers also love to misrepresent- selling stock e.g to pay off debt at a stock premium is not dilution- what is the difference between the co paying via cash or stock in such a situation-nothing except the co saved cash by issuing stock at a price higher than the current market price
logic dictates that the reason co's go public (w all the headaches and regs that involves) is to have the ability to raise funds via stock issuance (not just debt financing etc) until cash flow is sufficient- but when these co's issue stock bashers always act like such is some kind of crime plus dilution-
btw to the basher who said i was just an acct- i'm not an acct- thats just 1 of ca 6 degrees i have and it was essentially a command of the cult leader of the cult i grew up in by birth for the leaders selfish etc purposes- i hated accounting despite having all a's in it except one b- but not everybody is born to a playboy lifestyle- some are born to a life of service to save many lives etc
(3)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
