(Total Views: 236)
Posted On: 05/01/2017 8:42:51 AM
Post# of 43066
no .. i think Rick is a decent man who has done his best to get processors sold
as i have noted b4 .. folks can argue that going the route re: external sales
via ECO and OBG .. wasn't given enough time .. b4 the plug was pulled on
those efforts
i actually like the thought of internal sales' efforts .. for a variety of reasons
and clearly *imo* RH has a strong belief (based on page 32 of the 10K filed)
he is very close to P2O's first 2 processor sales ..
the time line isn't one *imo* RH controls .. there would be investors behind the buyer
so as i see it there are 3 sets of legal counsel to appease re: terms/conditions
i know exactly what i'm looking for out of this next Shareholder Update
suspect i'm not the only one to recognize it is the most significant of RH's tenure
as CEO of P2O
as for *hours* .. regardless of what you believe .. my belief is that this buyer
saw P2O's processors (2 and flagship) in operation in the back half of 2013
unlike some i see no reason for NF to come back on line until there is an outcome
on this first *southern* site .. one way or the other
the issue i have had with RH is communication related .. imo every set of financials' filed (4 per year) is owed an PR ..
even if it's just a cursory one or two paragraphs .. this CEO files everything
it's why i refer to him as mr. methodical and conservative
there is zero hyperbole with RH .. yet every CEO of every company regardless
of whether public or private PROMOTES .. RH barely communicates
just me perhaps but i suspect that pattern changes with P2O's MOU conveying to a DA
4kids
as i have noted b4 .. folks can argue that going the route re: external sales
via ECO and OBG .. wasn't given enough time .. b4 the plug was pulled on
those efforts
i actually like the thought of internal sales' efforts .. for a variety of reasons
and clearly *imo* RH has a strong belief (based on page 32 of the 10K filed)
he is very close to P2O's first 2 processor sales ..
the time line isn't one *imo* RH controls .. there would be investors behind the buyer
so as i see it there are 3 sets of legal counsel to appease re: terms/conditions
i know exactly what i'm looking for out of this next Shareholder Update
suspect i'm not the only one to recognize it is the most significant of RH's tenure
as CEO of P2O
as for *hours* .. regardless of what you believe .. my belief is that this buyer
saw P2O's processors (2 and flagship) in operation in the back half of 2013
unlike some i see no reason for NF to come back on line until there is an outcome
on this first *southern* site .. one way or the other
the issue i have had with RH is communication related .. imo every set of financials' filed (4 per year) is owed an PR ..
even if it's just a cursory one or two paragraphs .. this CEO files everything
it's why i refer to him as mr. methodical and conservative
there is zero hyperbole with RH .. yet every CEO of every company regardless
of whether public or private PROMOTES .. RH barely communicates
just me perhaps but i suspect that pattern changes with P2O's MOU conveying to a DA
4kids
Quote:
Do you ever think or do you ever wonder if Rick has also moved onto bigger and better things other than P2O?
Do you think he isn't even bothering wasting his time with P2O?
Or do you think he puts in a good 30-40 hours a week trying to sell a machine to save this company?
(2)
(1)
