(Total Views: 991)
Posted On: 04/28/2017 7:27:49 PM
Post# of 2198
Re: grundlefoss #1736
To answer your questions about IGLOW...the issue is because he DOES violate TOS every day and no one applies the site TOS to him while others who do the same exact thing as him get their posts deleted and then banned. Not him.
Yes, he violates SEC laws everyday and is he every restricted or banned? No.
And if someone he gets one post a week deleted, it is reinstated.
The TOS does NOT apply to him and other bashers who work for IHUB.
THAT is the issue. Other mods won't apply the TOS to him. One example is, he has personally attacked this company's CEO, made cultural/racial slurs about her, and those posts are not deleted. He's even made MANY comments about her gender.
How is her gender, race, and cultural identity "on topic?" It's not. But if you point that out, you get deleted and restricted while he continues to attack her personally.
Let's not be ignorant here. A disinfo agent (aka basher), which is what IGLOW is, is paid by IHUB and it's crew to illegally manipulate stocks. It's no secret. Look at their posting history. Everyday, 8-14 hours a day, for years, and you think otherwise?
Yes, he violates SEC laws everyday and is he every restricted or banned? No.
And if someone he gets one post a week deleted, it is reinstated.
The TOS does NOT apply to him and other bashers who work for IHUB.
THAT is the issue. Other mods won't apply the TOS to him. One example is, he has personally attacked this company's CEO, made cultural/racial slurs about her, and those posts are not deleted. He's even made MANY comments about her gender.
How is her gender, race, and cultural identity "on topic?" It's not. But if you point that out, you get deleted and restricted while he continues to attack her personally.
Let's not be ignorant here. A disinfo agent (aka basher), which is what IGLOW is, is paid by IHUB and it's crew to illegally manipulate stocks. It's no secret. Look at their posting history. Everyday, 8-14 hours a day, for years, and you think otherwise?
(1)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
