(Total Views: 284)
Posted On: 04/27/2017 9:59:03 AM
Post# of 22940
I have no idea nor do I immediately care about what he is referring to related to Bill/Angus/James. However, do you really understand the implications of what you just posted:
"Nothing you posted is correct. Nothing was posted in the Q, because the company has to hide its partners, income from IEA's, the BTL contract, MRVB income, stock repurchases, just because the the likes of you and your clan, harassing the company and new partners. "
This would CLEARLY be against SEC/FINRA regulations and underscores the very intention of the filing process to begin with. A public company can not "hide" its income from its shareholders or potential investors let alone the SEC. All material information is required to be reported. While there is certainly gray area on what or how a company constitutes "material" information- any revenue for a company that has had no revenues would certainly be relevant and thus material.
In the past week - posters on here have said the company is hiding income and driving the price to 0.0001 to execute a reverse merger at the lowest cost/price. For the past 3-6 months- the IR group has been actively encouraging shareholders to sell (when not encouraging them to buy aggressively on the short price spikes. The CEO seemed to be at substantial odds with the IR group on the value or actual business worthiness of a $135MM SLA/contract that was not only reported by IR but aggressively and repeatedly defended by them as being guaranteed. In the meantime, IR blames bashers, manipulators, disgruntled shareholders, and NITE for the low PPS. That argument wont fly in court.
There are now 4, distinct revenue streams (anecdotally) for TPAC and investors at large still have no reasonable or substantiated expectations of revenues for 2017 for any of them. Or does the company need to hide that and only reveal it to a select few as well...?
"Nothing you posted is correct. Nothing was posted in the Q, because the company has to hide its partners, income from IEA's, the BTL contract, MRVB income, stock repurchases, just because the the likes of you and your clan, harassing the company and new partners. "
This would CLEARLY be against SEC/FINRA regulations and underscores the very intention of the filing process to begin with. A public company can not "hide" its income from its shareholders or potential investors let alone the SEC. All material information is required to be reported. While there is certainly gray area on what or how a company constitutes "material" information- any revenue for a company that has had no revenues would certainly be relevant and thus material.
In the past week - posters on here have said the company is hiding income and driving the price to 0.0001 to execute a reverse merger at the lowest cost/price. For the past 3-6 months- the IR group has been actively encouraging shareholders to sell (when not encouraging them to buy aggressively on the short price spikes. The CEO seemed to be at substantial odds with the IR group on the value or actual business worthiness of a $135MM SLA/contract that was not only reported by IR but aggressively and repeatedly defended by them as being guaranteed. In the meantime, IR blames bashers, manipulators, disgruntled shareholders, and NITE for the low PPS. That argument wont fly in court.
There are now 4, distinct revenue streams (anecdotally) for TPAC and investors at large still have no reasonable or substantiated expectations of revenues for 2017 for any of them. Or does the company need to hide that and only reveal it to a select few as well...?
(2)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
