(Total Views: 471)
Posted On: 04/24/2017 9:01:44 AM
Post# of 11803
From the iHub board posted late last night.
scoop9 posted: Seriously,who has ever heard a company blame shareholders for it's own failure.
I wrote: I was told that DECN has the names of the shareholders that called Retail Monster, a list of the demands made by shareholders, and an agreement for Retail Monster to testify if needed. Then today, LOL, another DECN shareholder brought up exactly the same activities on this forum.
By the way, in my humble opinion, these shareholders committed these acts as individuals. Attempting to get a contractee to take part in a palace coup on behalf of shareholders, is not good behavior, and therefore....
Tortious interference, also known as intentional interference with contractual relations, in the common law of torts, occurs when one person intentionally damages someone else's contractual or business relationships with a third party causing economic harm.
And one last thing. I am told that one of the people that tried to get Retail Monster to take part in a palace coup, is also on the so called "Shasta list" of shareholders who contacted Shasta, received confidential company documents and then published them on this forum (on iHub, even as late as yesterday afternoon). I wonder who that person is?
All IMO. All except this single fact. What was done when contacting Retail Monster became securities fraud when it was demanded that Retail Monster take part in a palace coup to remove the officers and directors and take control of a company. That will be viewed by the Secretary of State in Nevada (the company's domicile) and the U.S. SEC as an illegal proxy. The SEC has banned illegal proxy conspirators for life in similar affairs.
scoop9 posted: Seriously,who has ever heard a company blame shareholders for it's own failure.
I wrote: I was told that DECN has the names of the shareholders that called Retail Monster, a list of the demands made by shareholders, and an agreement for Retail Monster to testify if needed. Then today, LOL, another DECN shareholder brought up exactly the same activities on this forum.
By the way, in my humble opinion, these shareholders committed these acts as individuals. Attempting to get a contractee to take part in a palace coup on behalf of shareholders, is not good behavior, and therefore....
Tortious interference, also known as intentional interference with contractual relations, in the common law of torts, occurs when one person intentionally damages someone else's contractual or business relationships with a third party causing economic harm.
And one last thing. I am told that one of the people that tried to get Retail Monster to take part in a palace coup, is also on the so called "Shasta list" of shareholders who contacted Shasta, received confidential company documents and then published them on this forum (on iHub, even as late as yesterday afternoon). I wonder who that person is?
All IMO. All except this single fact. What was done when contacting Retail Monster became securities fraud when it was demanded that Retail Monster take part in a palace coup to remove the officers and directors and take control of a company. That will be viewed by the Secretary of State in Nevada (the company's domicile) and the U.S. SEC as an illegal proxy. The SEC has banned illegal proxy conspirators for life in similar affairs.
(5)
(1)
