(Total Views: 683)
Posted On: 04/22/2017 11:49:21 AM
Post# of 15624
It's not just speculation. You can infer based on what happened to the stock. Anyone with a business sense would come to the same conclusion. Hell, you can make a comparison to Axim or example. They have nothing. They havent completed their trials, and their product isn't coming out for another 1-2 years. They are around 10$ because of proper management and PR. Keeping investors and the market informed.
1. The laissez faire approach that OWCP employed is not opinion. That part is fact.
2. Ziv performing poorly at the Wall Street conference is fact.
3. The stock tanking under his management is fact
4. The business side of things being pissed about that is fact. You cant expect them to be happy.
These aren't things to be upset and defensive about. These are things that got him replaced. Again you can infer these things if you have a business and sense, and considering that was my thing in University, yea I can say I'm likely right.
Also I'm not the only one who thinks so, obviously investors were thinking the same, because when he was replaced the stock went up. I like many others are relieved because the poor management was obvious.
1. The laissez faire approach that OWCP employed is not opinion. That part is fact.
2. Ziv performing poorly at the Wall Street conference is fact.
3. The stock tanking under his management is fact
4. The business side of things being pissed about that is fact. You cant expect them to be happy.
These aren't things to be upset and defensive about. These are things that got him replaced. Again you can infer these things if you have a business and sense, and considering that was my thing in University, yea I can say I'm likely right.
Also I'm not the only one who thinks so, obviously investors were thinking the same, because when he was replaced the stock went up. I like many others are relieved because the poor management was obvious.
(2)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
