(Total Views: 355)
Posted On: 04/19/2017 3:39:17 PM
Post# of 22940
Still standing behind these revenues hitting in 2017? IR/ $TPAC so far hasnt affirmed the numbers. I was called a basher for asking for verification/updates on these very numbers. Maybe you can get a public response.
To date - zero revenues reported on either front.
Trans-Pacific Aerospace C TPAC
Posted On: 09/28/2016 9:57:24 PM
Post#
13609
of 18626 GO
Replies (1)
Posted By: Ragz2Richez
Re: Rob124 #13604
yes but I don't see it as a huge impact just because they also have EIA in the works. the $85mill was once needed to acquire BTL...since we have established the LA/SLA it will now just lower tpac's overall cost basis to have that money as cash in hand...to bring instant value...working capital...price stability...& overall leverage to increase the bottom line.....just not as much as $85mill would do.
now toss in the EIA services...which now increased the annual revenue...compared to the BTL revs...of 300%
$13.5mill × 300% = $40.5mill ANNUALLY!
I think we will be just fine....imo
(9) (1)
To date - zero revenues reported on either front.
Trans-Pacific Aerospace C TPAC
Posted On: 09/28/2016 9:57:24 PM
Post#
13609
of 18626 GO
Replies (1)
Posted By: Ragz2Richez
Re: Rob124 #13604
yes but I don't see it as a huge impact just because they also have EIA in the works. the $85mill was once needed to acquire BTL...since we have established the LA/SLA it will now just lower tpac's overall cost basis to have that money as cash in hand...to bring instant value...working capital...price stability...& overall leverage to increase the bottom line.....just not as much as $85mill would do.
now toss in the EIA services...which now increased the annual revenue...compared to the BTL revs...of 300%
$13.5mill × 300% = $40.5mill ANNUALLY!
I think we will be just fine....imo
(9) (1)
(1)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
