(Total Views: 270)
Posted On: 04/06/2017 11:09:29 AM
Post# of 43065
cause first they'd have to scrounge them .. (and pay another CE for their use)
and then they'd have to *reset* them (mirrored and a %) and then odds are
they'd have to mark them .. which then would be documented ..
volume spigot re: abusive liquidity turned off at the EO 2016 .. that is why
last Wednesday's *gamble* was as stupid as it gets .. because actual P2O
investors picked off 80% of *volume* and CEs' abusive hole was added to
yet again ..
curious to see if P2O issues a separate 8K today for the RE asset close of 3.31.17
or if it's held for the K and presumably PR that accompanies it ..
4kids
and then they'd have to *reset* them (mirrored and a %) and then odds are
they'd have to mark them .. which then would be documented ..
volume spigot re: abusive liquidity turned off at the EO 2016 .. that is why
last Wednesday's *gamble* was as stupid as it gets .. because actual P2O
investors picked off 80% of *volume* and CEs' abusive hole was added to
yet again ..
curious to see if P2O issues a separate 8K today for the RE asset close of 3.31.17
or if it's held for the K and presumably PR that accompanies it ..
4kids
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
