20170323|PTOI|8658|0|24841|O 34.85%
8658 = 575/8083

so they had to *mark* one of the 2 8083 *trades*

which one? .. and was that (essentially) 8000 fed back on ask (adjusted) via 6100/2000?

hmmmm

and yep your eyes aren't deceiving you .. that 6100 has made the rounds b4 ..

was it the 8083 fed to ARCA @ 0426 on bid .. or the one that bypassed
*ARCA's presumed balance remaining on size @ 0426* for the trade @ 042?

ARCA	0.0426	20,000	09:25

see if ARCA *really* had 20000 @ 0426 on bid .. 8083 would have gone off
2x @ 0426 .. not also bypassing the next *visible* size (MM) showing on bid

NITE	0.0425	10,000	08:57

to actually go off @ 042 .. hopefully that mirrored trade went to a GTC on bid ..
i already know it bypassed one actual long's GTC @ 042 ..

will update accordingly

=====

today's efforts ..

15:17:57		0.049	2000	OTO .. @ ETRF's ask *adjusts*  

10:56:40		0.049	6100	OTO .. @ ETRF's ask *adjusts*  

09:35:37		0.049	575	OTO ** long's @ elastic ask .. NC .. marked 

09:30:04		0.042	8083	OTO .. mirrored trade (bypasses multi GTCs) 

09:30:03		0.0426	8083	OTO .. fed to ARCA (ATS Dark Pool in 6 weeks)

yeah .. this isn't scraping any barrel bottom .. it's a hedgies worst nitemare
aka life support .. praying like hell that P2O doesn't deliver so choices have
to be made ..

note the over 30% *marked* .. with 1 trade done via *bid*
and the other not adjusting in CONtrast to the 6100/2000 that *followed* it ..

currently one known long's pick .. also marked of 575

ETRF needs that decoder ring to *adjust* ..

it is obvious yet?

4kids