(Total Views: 277)
Posted On: 03/09/2017 6:59:24 PM
Post# of 7803
As Sinclair told me and Kyle, lots of tales get told. Little did he know it was SFRX's tale to the Court.
Now we have a sap who believed the bogus 3 item bs claiming an unnamed archaeologist CONFIRMED it was him.
The FBAR requires a research design be compiled by the archaeologist of record and submitted with their applications and reports. Sinclair told me and Kyle his 2014 research design was the latest greatest.
So why isn't there a revised research design? Probably because SFRX as well as the sap are targeting novices.
You give a reasonable explanation as to why it's not included. The whole purpose is to do archaeological research, right? So why omit this "alleged" fact given by SFRX and the sap?
Now we have a sap who believed the bogus 3 item bs claiming an unnamed archaeologist CONFIRMED it was him.
The FBAR requires a research design be compiled by the archaeologist of record and submitted with their applications and reports. Sinclair told me and Kyle his 2014 research design was the latest greatest.
So why isn't there a revised research design? Probably because SFRX as well as the sap are targeting novices.
You give a reasonable explanation as to why it's not included. The whole purpose is to do archaeological research, right? So why omit this "alleged" fact given by SFRX and the sap?
(0)
(0)
