(Total Views: 131)
Posted On: 03/06/2017 9:38:47 AM
Post# of 7802
Sure they have restrictions. Did you even read the current permit?
Why do you think GME has artifacts laying on the ocean floor? They too have restrictions.
As far as the deposition went it's Huffman's responsibility to have the "evidence" or documents thrown out. He hasn't.
But like jrf are you suggesting the FBAR conspired to defraud the Court?
If so, put up or shut up. The Defendant was right. They have no 80/20, no salvage rights, or some 3 item agreement. It was all BS.
I guarantee you if such agreements existed Kyle would have made sure they surfaced, and they would have been exhibits in SFRX's court filings.
Instead of showing the Court the Defendant was wrong, they simply claimed he was.
When pressed, they had to admit they hadn't lost any contracts (plural) even though they told the Court they did.
Now they filed with the SEC the case was moving to damages.
When?
Are they waiting for better weather and calmer seas?
What's the excuse this time?
Why do you think GME has artifacts laying on the ocean floor? They too have restrictions.
As far as the deposition went it's Huffman's responsibility to have the "evidence" or documents thrown out. He hasn't.
But like jrf are you suggesting the FBAR conspired to defraud the Court?
If so, put up or shut up. The Defendant was right. They have no 80/20, no salvage rights, or some 3 item agreement. It was all BS.
I guarantee you if such agreements existed Kyle would have made sure they surfaced, and they would have been exhibits in SFRX's court filings.
Instead of showing the Court the Defendant was wrong, they simply claimed he was.
When pressed, they had to admit they hadn't lost any contracts (plural) even though they told the Court they did.
Now they filed with the SEC the case was moving to damages.
When?
Are they waiting for better weather and calmer seas?
What's the excuse this time?
(0)
(0)
