Investors Hangout Stock Message Boards Logo
  • Home
  • Mailbox
  • Boards
  • Favorites
  • Whats Hot!
  • Login - Join Now!
Political Debate Board
(Total Views: 105)
Posted On: 03/04/2017 5:10:23 PM
Post# of 65629
Posted By: Bhawks
Re: cashclan #33341
It's that simple, if you are that simple.

I don't call having a proper degree of alarm over the hacking of our election on behalf of one candidate is having a 'hard-on'.

Neither do I think the sanctions against Russia over Crimea and the Ukraine, which have bi-partisan support, are inappropriate to the challenges.

Again, would a president Clinton escape condemnation if she were the beneficiary of the hacking and if she and the Dems were as accommodative toward Putin?

Righties would be wearing out the word 'treason', and you know it.


(1)
(0)









  • New Post - Investors HangoutNew Post

  • Public Reply - Investors HangoutPublic Reply

  • Private Reply - Investors HangoutPrivate Reply

  • Board - Investors HangoutBoard

  • More - Investors HangoutMore

  • Keep Post - Investors HangoutKeep Post
  • Report Post - Investors HangoutReport Post
  • Home - Investors HangoutHome
  • Mailbox - Investors HangoutMailbox
  • Boards - Investors HangoutBoards
  • Favorites - Investors HangoutFavorites
  • Whats Hot! - Investors HangoutWhats Hot!
  • Settings - Investors HangoutSettings
  • Login - Investors HangoutLogin
  • Live Site - Investors HangoutLive Site