trolls love to divert and deflect

or baffle with bs

so the original thrust pertained to CB (cost basis) and response
pivots elsewhere

bottom line is .. and what seems to elude NON RETAILs' perennially CONtracted interchangeables re: PTOI ..

is the majority of P2O investors .. have never sold one share and
as so many have long ago figured out .. if that same *target* didn't
sell in the first orchestrated RUN UP .. (Dec 2009) .. or the take DOWN
(May - June 2010) .. or after the first hit piece was authored in CONjunction
with LONDON CALLING (July 2010) .. or even the round trip RUN UP for
the TAKE DOWN in Dec 2010 (70c to 1.35 to 75c) ..

or the *set up* of 2011 .. btw reg sho %s blowing up and out these last
few weeks .. oddly enough reminds me of March 2011 .. when PTOI had
(to this day) record setting *volume* of 8M in April 2011 .. or over the summer
when reg sho triggered threshold for the first time .. (pre stats' perversion)

or even with the events of Jan 2012 .. when documentation reveals NON RETAILs'
MMs' UC the ask on PTOI by 10 to 20c at a whack to *create the panic to shake shares*

with Jan 2013's *settlement* .. PTOI would have her last illegally orchestrated
RUN UP .. stopped out @ 1.49 .. because .. to this day NON RETAILs'
abusive hole (embedded since April 2009) includes the problem pps of 1.50
to 1.65

that is over 4 years ago and it's why *volume* matters

and that 1M abusive short of Dec 2009 .. would CONtinue to be added to
regardless of how many times PTOI would be *compressed via resets*

it's also why when P2O was wrested back in mid August 2013 .. the current
CEO got no honeymoon

find any other OTC company whose CEO infused $Millon$ and cycle of
money takes the PPS DOWN .. ironically it would be that event that would
catch the interest of *then* new investor .. who knows NON RETAILs' game
as i do ..

which is why i laugh when *trolls* whine daily about others' CBs ..
again all with interest ask yourself one teeny tiny little ? .. do you spend
anytime on any SMB (stk msg bd) where you don't have a financial interest?

amazing how many *allegedly* non invested participants have an interest in P2O/PTOI

it has never passed anyone's smell test

this actual P2O investor .. like others .. holds tons more $PTOI *shares*
today .. then 3 years ago .. and because bragging only comes from interchangeables (crews)
actual P2O investors rarely mention CBs or share counts .. and since *fishing for intel*
is one of NON RETAILs' specialties .. i suspect most understand why 2017's paucity
of volume aligns directly with 2009's

NON RETAIL threw everything at this company and stock since 2009
and everyone who has done the DD .. knows it .. some clearly far more than others

another long (not an original) who first bought PTOI in 2009 .. but rarely bought
PTOI shares to lower CB .. did so after LL's initial infusion (8k'd ) .. for 6 weeks
this individual picked off 1.1M PTOI *shares* @ a PPS that ranged from 044
to 048/049

that was late in August 2016 to early October 2016 ..

and imo that one long's buys .. forced NON RETAIL to have VNDM *report*
in the PRIMARY for PTOI for OCTOBER 2016 .. because NN would have
triggered reg sho for a 3rd time

imo for the first time since they came public P2O actually controls $PTOI

and even more interesting .. is since 2009 .. NON RETAILs' emissaries
have pummeled the company .. as if by magic (seamless) a table top model
would go to scale and then instant sales/install and deployment

it is clear to anyone who has any basic knowledge of how disruptive techs
work .. start ups is a common phrase .. that realistic time lines were never
accorded to P2O

then all are supposed to ignore the impact of NON RETAILs' efforts
(years of efforts) would have on both the stock and by default the company

i know boxes of rocks that are smarter compared to some who proclaim
they are investors .. either that or they've never taken the time to listen
to one CC of any start up in transition

i'll make a prediction here .. re: $SNAP (IPO'd this week)

when one knows the rigged game .. one can play off the players

it won't surprise me if SNAP goes to lofty *market cap* valuations .. a la GPRO
because of course the market cap has nothing to do with *reality* re: SNAP

reality is a paucity of *shares* to access .. and months b4 lock ups come to pass

and yep .. $GPRO triggered reg sho for months ..

note the overlap PTOI shares with SNAP .. a paucity of shares able to be accessed

this is why someone within NON RETAILs' *circle of decoys* .. turned off the spigot @ the EO 2016

my best guess is the 3M settlement cert and the 1M (presumed) cert of July 2016
wash traded between CFGN and NN .. had no *give* left to *give* in 2017

it may well be that CDEL's ask @ 05 is totally bogus (for show only)
leaving NN's elastic 10000 ask @ 05 .. b4 VNDM takes center stage again
@ 051 (also an elastic ask of 10000) .. just my 2c on VNDM but i don't see
that *effort* put into play this month .. as was done last Fall .. but i am curious
as to where up the ask they relo to ... a la CANT's relo this past week just below 30c

which brings us almost full circle .. back to (approx) Sept 2013 .. when P2O
was wrested back ..

slow and steady wins this war ..

4kids