(Total Views: 120)
Posted On: 03/03/2017 6:27:53 PM
Post# of 65629
Short take? It simply confirms a remarkable willingness to absolve the Administration of any responsibility and accountability for it's own actions.
Reread it. Nothing is the fault of any the alleged 'aggrieved' in the article. No mistakes were made. No ethical lapses occurred.
If you think I've misinterpreted anything take the 'test' I've suggested many times, in many posts.
Flip everything by political Party, exactly as it has unfolded from the hacking down to today, and then ask yourself it you'd give a lick of credence to anything in the article.
If I didn't make it clear enough, would you cut the same slack, make the same excuses, believe the same conjectures if they applied to the newly elected Clinton administration? Most particularly would you like her 'Russian connections'?
It's not a difficult exercise, if you work from a single standard.
Reread it. Nothing is the fault of any the alleged 'aggrieved' in the article. No mistakes were made. No ethical lapses occurred.
If you think I've misinterpreted anything take the 'test' I've suggested many times, in many posts.
Flip everything by political Party, exactly as it has unfolded from the hacking down to today, and then ask yourself it you'd give a lick of credence to anything in the article.
If I didn't make it clear enough, would you cut the same slack, make the same excuses, believe the same conjectures if they applied to the newly elected Clinton administration? Most particularly would you like her 'Russian connections'?
It's not a difficult exercise, if you work from a single standard.
(0)
(0)
