Nieither. Flawed as a communicator and a campaigner. Just as Trump was flawed when it came to facts and evidence for most of what he said.

Now we're back to the 'content' of the hacks which justified the means of hacking in your peculiar moral universe.

And your characterizations of Clinton are those of the bizarre alt-reality fake-news crowd.

You sound like the Nixon apologists as he and his administration 'unraveled'.

I look forward to more of your lame attempts to defend the indefensible.