(Total Views: 550)
Posted On: 02/20/2017 1:52:57 PM
Post# of 96881
![](/m/assets/46931549/no_avatar_available_thumb.jpg)
Non-Transferable has a 9.1 out of 10 rank on imdb!
anyway u slice it that's an impressive rank for a
very low budget movie only meant for a niche
audience into rom/com chick flicks.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt5176390/ratings?ref_=tt_ov_rt
Also UF alexa rank has been improving ever since
Non-Transferable was released.
http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/ultraflix.com
As a test case movie for using the new SWIG tech
incorporated into UF imo its fair to conclude NTEK
made a brilliant choice for the low $$$ they put out.
I think GULAS deliberately is using Non-Transferable
as a test case to take to the MAJOR STUDIOS and
show them how this new tech distribution model can work
using the SWIG/UF/NTEK model on a much larger scale!
So now we wait for GULAS to deliver on a MAJOR STUDIO
Contract and its going to be a very GREEN year here
when he does.
anyway u slice it that's an impressive rank for a
very low budget movie only meant for a niche
audience into rom/com chick flicks.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt5176390/ratings?ref_=tt_ov_rt
Also UF alexa rank has been improving ever since
Non-Transferable was released.
http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/ultraflix.com
As a test case movie for using the new SWIG tech
incorporated into UF imo its fair to conclude NTEK
made a brilliant choice for the low $$$ they put out.
I think GULAS deliberately is using Non-Transferable
as a test case to take to the MAJOR STUDIOS and
show them how this new tech distribution model can work
using the SWIG/UF/NTEK model on a much larger scale!
So now we wait for GULAS to deliver on a MAJOR STUDIO
Contract and its going to be a very GREEN year here
when he does.
![](/m/images/thumb-up.png)
![](/m/images/thumb-down.png)
Scroll down for more posts ▼