I'm a bit less optimistic that Mr. Bordynuik's version of heating plastic is any more worthwhile than anyone else's version but if Mr. Heddle could provide evidence of that value, it wouldn't matter. Sure, I would split that venture 50/50 with you.

However if the original claims are true then the processor would pay for itself in less than a year and we would have to get in line. Not as good as the processor paying for itself in eight days like PTOI's original $80,000 version supposedly could do before it was "enhanced," but still extremely good.

These days nobody knows how economically PTOI's process works because Mr. Heddle's lips are sealed. As is invariably the case, Mr. Heddle isn't hiding the results because those results show the process is economically viable--he's hiding the results because the process is worthless. It certainly works to liquify plastic as many failed companies before PTOI have already shown...but it's economically worthless.

Investors who choose to instead listen to the voices saying that short sellers, market makers, boogiemen and other "colluding entities" are to blame for PTOI's share price and/or the "destruction" of the company should understand that those voices have ridden the stock down from dollars to a few pennies and are still confident enough to say that shorts are running scared. Those omnipresent voices are not the ones who should be relied upon for rational advice.