(Total Views: 251)
Posted On: 01/30/2017 10:48:45 AM
Post# of 43066
i have to disagree re: MC as they had no investors to fund the site
and in NYS .. some one has to spend the monies to be reimbursed
it all comes back to investors funding buyers
i sincerely expect if the issue for RH was as simple as turning over 4 and 5
it would have been done .. maybe it still will be .. i don't know ..
but i do know that suggestion was made this time last year .. and clearly wasn't
believed to be needed
btw .. the interesting aspect imo about RH .. is the almost total lack of *rumors*
thx for the response ..
4kids
and in NYS .. some one has to spend the monies to be reimbursed
it all comes back to investors funding buyers
i sincerely expect if the issue for RH was as simple as turning over 4 and 5
it would have been done .. maybe it still will be .. i don't know ..
but i do know that suggestion was made this time last year .. and clearly wasn't
believed to be needed
btw .. the interesting aspect imo about RH .. is the almost total lack of *rumors*
thx for the response ..
4kids
Quote:
I am not nearly as privy to some information as others so, please forgive my lack of knowledge. For me (been here since 6/09) there have been many chances to move this company forward. Madison County comes to mind. Perhaps we don't need a 20-40 ton / day monster? Maybe a smaller unit would work for some? Maybe cleaning HTF oil instead of plastic? Maybe like someone suggested give the first one away to get foot in the door? Activate NF on a smaller scale to at least have revenue? Open a channel of communication with shareholders, afterall they are a reporting company. What happened to shareholder meeting? Aren't they required as a reporting company to have one? Management IS the problem. Yes there are problems beyond their control and there always will be but, IMO that shouldn't be holding the company back this long. Please forgive the rant and if some of these questions have been answered already.
(1)
(0)
