Exactly. That's why shorty backed off. If you take the loss and end up chasing the pps when you finally realize why it's happening, it could cost you more than you deferred. It's a roll of the dice cause if the volatility is high you might pay quite a bit more for replacement shares.

I think some are misunderstanding our argument because they haven't fully processed the current status of the company or feel they have to have dry ink first. I've said it several times, Jerry hasn't lied about anything to pump the pps. He may have been a little over zealous a couple of times early on, but recognizing the need for strategy changes are essential for start ups.

They have to roll with the changes/punches, being able to think on their feet and respond quickly even if it's a little disappointing at first. Difficult decisions have to be made. So far I think they've done an amazing job of it, dodged some bullets, and been in the right places at the right times for phenomenal opportunities that are about to change the game in a huge way. 2017 will make the wait well worth it, and it'll just be the beginning.