Posted On: 12/26/2016 11:38:32 AM
Post# of 22940
So once again IR is saying the stock price is STILL overvalued and that current shareholders should have sold a long time ago. This is despite standing behind the $0.01 PPS YE target and encouraging shareholders to secure shares while they could. Now they are saying new class c shares cant be manipulated or converted and are safe from dilution. However, Bill was just saying on here that the AS increase WASNT for dilution and they would be reducing OS. Further, IR kept promoting MRVB and the buyback loop as eliminating outside manipulation. Is that no longer the case?
So - which is it? I have been a strong supporter of Bill but the constant double messaging is plain wrong. If IR is a complete, separate entity - stop having them speak for the company. If Bill is reading this board, I hope he reconsiders having an investor CC - one that is moderated and held by him. I know several largeshareholders are looking for some clarification and Q&A in an open format (for disclosure purposes) in plain spoken language without the agitation or word riddles from IR.
So - which is it? I have been a strong supporter of Bill but the constant double messaging is plain wrong. If IR is a complete, separate entity - stop having them speak for the company. If Bill is reading this board, I hope he reconsiders having an investor CC - one that is moderated and held by him. I know several largeshareholders are looking for some clarification and Q&A in an open format (for disclosure purposes) in plain spoken language without the agitation or word riddles from IR.
(7)
(0)
Scroll down for more posts ▼