Posted On: 12/18/2016 12:24:17 PM
Post# of 22940
I think you misunderstood my post. I basically implied that the company should continue to rely on shareholder financing to continue operations & should not dip into its mrvb earnings to retire shares or prevent further dilution.
If doing the above continues to allow the MRVB to rapidly grow in value, then by all means - lets trash the SS. Bring her right down to .0001. It won't take much to retire billions of shares in the trip zero range.
I also want to note that the continued military aggression between the U.S & China will not do well for the trade relationship between the two countries. If war were to break out, we could possibly lose the SLA / LA with BTL & that manufacturer in general. There is of course TPAC AU to fall back on, but we have heard little news in regards to that.
The fruits of TPAC's labor are not ripe & ready to be eaten by shareholders yet.
imo
If doing the above continues to allow the MRVB to rapidly grow in value, then by all means - lets trash the SS. Bring her right down to .0001. It won't take much to retire billions of shares in the trip zero range.
I also want to note that the continued military aggression between the U.S & China will not do well for the trade relationship between the two countries. If war were to break out, we could possibly lose the SLA / LA with BTL & that manufacturer in general. There is of course TPAC AU to fall back on, but we have heard little news in regards to that.
The fruits of TPAC's labor are not ripe & ready to be eaten by shareholders yet.
imo
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
