Posted On: 12/15/2016 1:26:56 PM
Post# of 22462
The caveat here is we only received the PR identifying the Funded development agreement with Nitto Denko that occured in October. It was not on any 8K and "QMC" is asking for a proxy vote.
Timing is terrible and does not look good. The key here is"Funded Development Agreement" It has to be a financial statement of its material relevance signed buy an auditor to be included in and stipulated in the proxy information packet to share holders.
I really would like to know what I would be voting on yes or no. Moreover, we all have seen the activity of QMC validating where we all thought we are. It's business, it's "Truth and Accuracy in Reporting".
All contracts are material.
Sunyn75
Timing is terrible and does not look good. The key here is"Funded Development Agreement" It has to be a financial statement of its material relevance signed buy an auditor to be included in and stipulated in the proxy information packet to share holders.
I really would like to know what I would be voting on yes or no. Moreover, we all have seen the activity of QMC validating where we all thought we are. It's business, it's "Truth and Accuracy in Reporting".
All contracts are material.
Sunyn75
(1)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
