Posted On: 12/12/2016 9:23:17 AM
Post# of 3603
After a reverse split of, say 1 for 100, any capital appreciation in the event that the stock would go up, as you suggested, would be reduced 100 fold. Not a good thing. However, if the SP goes down after a reverse split, your losses would be reduced accordingly.
Penny atocks have their own enharent risks but speaking in general, if a stock were to split 2 for 1, which would you rather have, 1 share or 100? In my opinion, over time, capital growth is paramount to the number of shares you own, and that is before considering possible future dividends.
JMO- stay long and strong until we see if George can raise the start up capital required for Coates to run the course.. There is much potential for the CSRV concept.
Penny atocks have their own enharent risks but speaking in general, if a stock were to split 2 for 1, which would you rather have, 1 share or 100? In my opinion, over time, capital growth is paramount to the number of shares you own, and that is before considering possible future dividends.
JMO- stay long and strong until we see if George can raise the start up capital required for Coates to run the course.. There is much potential for the CSRV concept.
(2)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
