Posted On: 11/21/2016 11:53:01 AM
Post# of 22940
Would you have preferred the company not under go the painfully expensive reconstruction process and instead be subject to the whims of the aerospace giants?
Boeing has increased their payout time to 6 months and has reduced the amount they are willing to pay for aerospace components. Not good..
Can you visualize where the company, stock, and shareholders would be then - if we only had that entity to rely on?
It has been a tough year, but we should be optimistic that things will change. The SLA / LA route was the best option to take. More profit - less expense. Same goes for EIA & the MRVB. Once payments from the SLA with BTL start coming in, things are going to look a lot better for the company & MRVB.
imo
Boeing has increased their payout time to 6 months and has reduced the amount they are willing to pay for aerospace components. Not good..
Can you visualize where the company, stock, and shareholders would be then - if we only had that entity to rely on?
It has been a tough year, but we should be optimistic that things will change. The SLA / LA route was the best option to take. More profit - less expense. Same goes for EIA & the MRVB. Once payments from the SLA with BTL start coming in, things are going to look a lot better for the company & MRVB.
imo
(5)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
