Poem, the word 'paradox' should have tipped you off that an increase in ice coverage at one pole is not inconsistent with climate change and consequent global warming.

Also, the 'take home message' undercuts YOUR belief...but not the premise of the piece, which again is a ....paradox, but not a refutation of climate change theory.

Quote:

---

“paradox of Antarctic sea ice”

Quote:

---

something (such as a situation) that is made up of two opposite things and that seems impossible but is actually true or possible.

---

Quote:

---

The take home messages is that while the increase in total Antarctic sea ice area is relatively minor compared to the Arctic, it masks the fact that some regions are in strong decline. Given the complex interactions of winds and currents driving patterns of sea ice variability and change in the Southern Ocean climate system, this is not unexpected .

---

Read More: http://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=4178...z4QYxXgoXd

---

Quote:

---

fitz - Recently NASA reported that this year’s maximum wintertime extent of Antarctic sea ice was the largest on record, even greater than the previous year’s record.

Read More: investorshangout.com/post/view?id=4178573#ixzz4QYxoOtDE

---