Posted On: 10/12/2016 1:24:38 PM
Post# of 65629
Yeah, I'm sure that the WSJ side of the NBC/WSJ Polls 'house' rolled over and agreed to a methodology so heavily weighted to one side as to make it meaningless.
Look, if you need to cherry pick a poll to make yourself feel better the LA Times poll is your outlier of choice. Rasmussen is your backup, at least it was until a day or so ago.
Here's a look at which way polls 'leaned' in 12. If the same polls, highly ranked for accuracy in '12, are showing Clinton leading now, you're cooked.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/which-pol...tial-race/
Look, if you need to cherry pick a poll to make yourself feel better the LA Times poll is your outlier of choice. Rasmussen is your backup, at least it was until a day or so ago.
Here's a look at which way polls 'leaned' in 12. If the same polls, highly ranked for accuracy in '12, are showing Clinton leading now, you're cooked.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/which-pol...tial-race/
(1)
(0)
