Posted On: 10/05/2016 6:21:08 PM
Post# of 30015
![](/m/assets/46931549/no_avatar_available_thumb.jpg)
I remember GC tweeting last Spring that they postponed the vote then because they were told by the SEC they needed to file the 10-K first. Not sure if there is any law that states the filings - the 10-Q in this case need to be current before a vote?
I don't see why they would want to approve the R/S with just the consent of the note holders. Even though they have the majority voting rights and would out-vote the shareholders, why not have the vote anyway and why would they have issued the preliminary proxy? They haven't cancelled the meeting yet, haven't filed the 10-Q- no update. We are in the dark at this point.
I don't see why they would want to approve the R/S with just the consent of the note holders. Even though they have the majority voting rights and would out-vote the shareholders, why not have the vote anyway and why would they have issued the preliminary proxy? They haven't cancelled the meeting yet, haven't filed the 10-Q- no update. We are in the dark at this point.
![](/m/images/thumb-up.png)
![](/m/images/thumb-down.png)