Posted On: 10/04/2016 3:06:51 PM
Post# of 248
An others post
If Bruce had the goods he would of been present at the Cyber security conference 2016 which he was not.
If Bruce had the goods he would have rolled out commercialization VP to the 10 beta tester in the USA and Europe.
If Bruce had the goods he would have signed contracts with potential clients put on hold waiting for version 3.1 to come out.
If Bruce had the goods he would have signed at least one client over the 19 months version 3.1 has been out.
If Bruce had the goods he would have signed the two OEMs that field tested the product 5 and 9 months.
If Bruce had the goods he would not continually spend R&D money on a product that no one wants.
If Bruce had the goods VLDI would not need Channel partners plain and simple.
No revenue, no contracts, no credibility, only continual past failures like the global rollout that should have happen in Q2 with no explanation why it did not happen.
If Bruce had the goods he would of been present at the Cyber security conference 2016 which he was not.
If Bruce had the goods he would have rolled out commercialization VP to the 10 beta tester in the USA and Europe.
If Bruce had the goods he would have signed contracts with potential clients put on hold waiting for version 3.1 to come out.
If Bruce had the goods he would have signed at least one client over the 19 months version 3.1 has been out.
If Bruce had the goods he would have signed the two OEMs that field tested the product 5 and 9 months.
If Bruce had the goods he would not continually spend R&D money on a product that no one wants.
If Bruce had the goods VLDI would not need Channel partners plain and simple.
No revenue, no contracts, no credibility, only continual past failures like the global rollout that should have happen in Q2 with no explanation why it did not happen.
(0)
(0)
