Risk to reward. We support HJOE, but support our investment in the company and want what is best for our own dollars. There is zero wrong with stating it or stating that and your concern. HJOE will not stay away from SEC scrutiny for another two years, IMO only. If there are others to go after, I'm hoping some of those "others" reside on a different thread and go by others aliases as opposed to more toxic debt. My assumption only is that this is the last of it, but I can only guess. It goes back to risk to reward. Even marathons end. We either win it, stop the race or lose it. All in ones tolerance level.