>>>> John should have erred on the side of the caution that was recommended to him <<<<

This is once again:

"based on a wholesale acceptance of the allegations in the SEC complaint, coupled with a wholesale rejection of JBI's answer to the complaint"

Which is laughable.  The local SEC attorney, charging JBII with a math error, couldn't even get the math right in the complaint.  Isn't that ironic?

(nearly 1000% should have said nearly 900%)