Posted On: 09/02/2016 6:11:08 PM
Post# of 22940
Note the keyword "TRIGGER" in this mornings email....
THIS ISNT GONA BE A SLOW CLIMB FOLKS, THIS IS GOING TO BE A ROCKET LAUNCH!!!
TRIGGER: /ˈtriɡər/ noun
1. a small device that releases a spring or catch and so sets off a mechanism, especially in order to fire a gun.
2. an event or thing that causes something to happen: the trigger for the spike was the closure of the loan.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The 52 week high is .0072. The loan can automatically propel the stock price pass the 52 week high……
TPAC is looking at things in a different light.
So just with the full loan from EX IM, TPAC could carry out this. Maybe an EIA’s retained earnings in a calendar year can trigger it…note the word “TRIGGER”.
The difference of 90 days ago….the loan was to be used to acquire facilities and increase manufacturing output; today all that has changed through Service Level Agreements and Licensing Agreements. TPAC doesn’t have those prior needs.
TPAC DOESN’T HAVE THE SAME FINANCIAL NEEDS AND IT DOESN’T HAVE DEBT.
TPAC can channel its money elsewhere……. no better place than an MRVB as cash-on-hand. TPAC would never have to do any other business and it would grow just off interest, which is REVENUE.
Add the MRVB and BTL, as long as they are in effect, the IPPS grows AUTOMATICALLY.
Happy Labor Day to All
THIS ISNT GONA BE A SLOW CLIMB FOLKS, THIS IS GOING TO BE A ROCKET LAUNCH!!!
TRIGGER: /ˈtriɡər/ noun
1. a small device that releases a spring or catch and so sets off a mechanism, especially in order to fire a gun.
2. an event or thing that causes something to happen: the trigger for the spike was the closure of the loan.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The 52 week high is .0072. The loan can automatically propel the stock price pass the 52 week high……
TPAC is looking at things in a different light.
So just with the full loan from EX IM, TPAC could carry out this. Maybe an EIA’s retained earnings in a calendar year can trigger it…note the word “TRIGGER”.
The difference of 90 days ago….the loan was to be used to acquire facilities and increase manufacturing output; today all that has changed through Service Level Agreements and Licensing Agreements. TPAC doesn’t have those prior needs.
TPAC DOESN’T HAVE THE SAME FINANCIAL NEEDS AND IT DOESN’T HAVE DEBT.
TPAC can channel its money elsewhere……. no better place than an MRVB as cash-on-hand. TPAC would never have to do any other business and it would grow just off interest, which is REVENUE.
Add the MRVB and BTL, as long as they are in effect, the IPPS grows AUTOMATICALLY.
Happy Labor Day to All
(10)
(1)Scroll down for more posts ▼
