Roger's right, it's a damn nice job. It's excellent work with good software is what I think, the transparency was clearly (no pun intended) adjusted, either manually or automatically by the software, to make it "fit" the lighting conditions. Anyhow, it really isn't a big deal, and I also don't see an issue with the response from mods at this point either. It's a good job and it could fool anyone. All I said to you was that it's not relevant to the subject being photographed. If it were, and someone was trying to scam viewers with it, then whoever did it wouldn't be likely to post both photos since it's the only likely way anyone would notice. So far what I'm seeing is YOU trying to create distraction and argument on this board yet AGAIN. Good work for someone who's not a basher.