Posted On: 08/27/2016 9:56:28 AM
Post# of 72447
you might want to reconsider
when they source the irritant who mucks with their flow of money .. they target
(Eastern bloc hires come to mind)
60000 bully/bot posts (last October) are one visible example
there are numerous others not so visible
zero doubts .. FILTH will scurry like *rats* .. with discovery/exposure
too bad it will be due to efforts not connected to the morons at the SEC tasked
with retails' keeping
4kids
when they source the irritant who mucks with their flow of money .. they target
(Eastern bloc hires come to mind)
60000 bully/bot posts (last October) are one visible example
there are numerous others not so visible
Quote:
I am reluctantly coming around to agreement with the view that everyone ought to have to post under their real name on the internet.
Sigh.
zero doubts .. FILTH will scurry like *rats* .. with discovery/exposure
too bad it will be due to efforts not connected to the morons at the SEC tasked
with retails' keeping
4kids
(1)
(0)
