Let's see. first the 'breaking' had the name of the poll, a well recognized one.

Secondly, the link was just beneath the headline:

http://polling.reuters.com/#!poll/TM651Y15_DS...potlight/1

And there is this too, which I suggested to you from their track record that it should be your 'go to' polling compilation source:

http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-elec...id=rrpromo

Of course facts do matter.