Posted On: 08/17/2016 10:20:14 PM
Post# of 72440
But wait, there's more. (Sullivan certainly has an entertaining way with words)
Quote:
On January 11, 2016, the Rosen Law Firm filed the Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”). This pleading cobbled together a myriad of misrepresentation claims, primarily based on scientific opinions and information regarding the operation of Defendants’ drugs. These claims were not legitimate claims; in fact they lacked any merit whatsoever, in many cases were both factually and legally deficient, and appear to have been brought to survive a motion to dismiss and to attempt to avoid sanctions. Defendants moved to dismiss and, in most cases, supplied the Court with at least five independent reasons why each claim could be dismissed.
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
