Posted On: 08/06/2016 12:35:12 PM
Post# of 82692
BURDEN of PROOF is now LOWER for PATENT Holders!
This could be HUGE for SFOR in its upcoming lawsuits.
The ruling below cam AFTER SFOR already won against
MICROSOFT so arguably with this ruling it should be
even EASIER NOW for SFOR to win against other
PATENT infringers!
http://www.essentialpatentblog.com/2016/06/su...o-v-pulse/
Supreme Court ruling increases patent owners’ ability to get enhanced damages (Halo v. Pulse)
By David Long on June 13, 2016
Posted in Appeals, Litigation
Today, the Supreme Court issued an opinion that replaces the Federal Circuit’s strict Seagate test for enhanced patent damages with a test that is easier for patent owners to meet. Relying extensively on the Court’s recent Octane and Highmark decisions that created an easier standard to receive attorney fees in exceptional patent cases, the Supreme Court ruled as follows:
1.Eliminated Seagate’s objective recklessness prong (that avoided an accused infringer’s subjective belief) and focused on a subjective basis for enhancing damages given an infringer’s egregious conduct in the particular circumstances of the case, which behavior goes beyond what is found in a typical patent case.
2.Lowered the patent owner’s burden of proof from the “clear and convincing evidence” standard to the lower “preponderance of the evidence” standard generally applied to infringement.
3.Adopted a simple “abuse of discretion” standard of review that requires the Federal Circuit to defer more to the district court’s decision whether to enhance damages.
Judge Breyer’s concurring opinion explains his understanding of today’s decision and the limits on enhancing damages. He sought to avoid the perception that the decision reverts back to pre-Seagate law where costly opinions of counsel were sought upon simply receiving notice of a patent and much litigation centered around such opinions and waiving privilege by relying on them.
This could be HUGE for SFOR in its upcoming lawsuits.
The ruling below cam AFTER SFOR already won against
MICROSOFT so arguably with this ruling it should be
even EASIER NOW for SFOR to win against other
PATENT infringers!
http://www.essentialpatentblog.com/2016/06/su...o-v-pulse/
Supreme Court ruling increases patent owners’ ability to get enhanced damages (Halo v. Pulse)
By David Long on June 13, 2016
Posted in Appeals, Litigation
Today, the Supreme Court issued an opinion that replaces the Federal Circuit’s strict Seagate test for enhanced patent damages with a test that is easier for patent owners to meet. Relying extensively on the Court’s recent Octane and Highmark decisions that created an easier standard to receive attorney fees in exceptional patent cases, the Supreme Court ruled as follows:
1.Eliminated Seagate’s objective recklessness prong (that avoided an accused infringer’s subjective belief) and focused on a subjective basis for enhancing damages given an infringer’s egregious conduct in the particular circumstances of the case, which behavior goes beyond what is found in a typical patent case.
2.Lowered the patent owner’s burden of proof from the “clear and convincing evidence” standard to the lower “preponderance of the evidence” standard generally applied to infringement.
3.Adopted a simple “abuse of discretion” standard of review that requires the Federal Circuit to defer more to the district court’s decision whether to enhance damages.
Judge Breyer’s concurring opinion explains his understanding of today’s decision and the limits on enhancing damages. He sought to avoid the perception that the decision reverts back to pre-Seagate law where costly opinions of counsel were sought upon simply receiving notice of a patent and much litigation centered around such opinions and waiving privilege by relying on them.
(0)
(0)
