Posted On: 07/05/2016 1:00:11 PM
Post# of 22940
Re: tradingjeff #9909
thank you. i agree
"Because there won't be revenue from the SLAs/LAs until this time next year, it's possible the pps will languish where it is until then, with some short-term spikes, possibly. "
in my reply to mag1 i just posted i laid out the same scenario above in terms of short, mid, and long term trading/investing and i agree. i think there will be several short term (1-3 months) spikes for short term trading wins and if the company executes on contracts NOW to secure cash flow for 2016 operations and staves off further dilution - the long term can be very attractive. i agree the mid term will be very volatile and more than likely relatively flat to down unless they provide PRs with specific revenues and timelines that put the long term back in sharp focus.
"Because there won't be revenue from the SLAs/LAs until this time next year, it's possible the pps will languish where it is until then, with some short-term spikes, possibly. "
in my reply to mag1 i just posted i laid out the same scenario above in terms of short, mid, and long term trading/investing and i agree. i think there will be several short term (1-3 months) spikes for short term trading wins and if the company executes on contracts NOW to secure cash flow for 2016 operations and staves off further dilution - the long term can be very attractive. i agree the mid term will be very volatile and more than likely relatively flat to down unless they provide PRs with specific revenues and timelines that put the long term back in sharp focus.
(6)
(0)
