Investors Hangout Stock Message Boards Logo
  • Home
  • Mailbox
  • Boards
  • Favorites
  • Whats Hot!
  • Login - Join Now!
Political Debate Board
Posted On: 07/01/2016 1:11:00 PM
Post# of 65629
Posted By: Bhawks
Re: OMO #13440
The point of the article was that free trade is subjective and hard to
enforce.

And that there are inevitable trade-offs, pun intended, between free trade and sovereignty.

The examples of N, Korea and the '30's' were illustrative.

As for Warren, the best she could hope for is better enforcement of existing rules.

Agree with her or not, you'll never see such coherence from Trump.

Hysterical sound bites are not policy prescriptions. Neither is calling Warren Pocahontas helpful to the discussion.


(0)
(0)









  • New Post - Investors HangoutNew Post

  • Public Reply - Investors HangoutPublic Reply

  • Private Reply - Investors HangoutPrivate Reply

  • Board - Investors HangoutBoard

  • More - Investors HangoutMore

  • Keep Post - Investors HangoutKeep Post
  • Report Post - Investors HangoutReport Post
  • Home - Investors HangoutHome
  • Mailbox - Investors HangoutMailbox
  • Boards - Investors HangoutBoards
  • Favorites - Investors HangoutFavorites
  • Whats Hot! - Investors HangoutWhats Hot!
  • Settings - Investors HangoutSettings
  • Login - Investors HangoutLogin
  • Live Site - Investors HangoutLive Site