Posted On: 06/23/2016 9:37:07 AM
Post# of 96892
Re: Krisandtilly #61408
IMO, a Netflix style prescription would be a very bad idea at this stage of UF development.
There simply isn't enough programming or diversity to produce a constant cash inflow.
Sure, there would be a huge boost to begin with UNTIL subscribers watch all the newer content that they want for a few months and then they would go away.
Once again, in my opinion.
A MUCH better constant revenue producer is what they are offering now which is the "specials", 10 for or 20 for but no more than that.
The 99 for, IMO, was, and is, a bad idea as it most likely produced "one time" income and that's the end of that customer.
Without either live programming or an immense selection of newer movies and TV series then a monthly subscription rate will produce a "BOOOOM" as KT likes to say, but not a long term cash producer.
There simply isn't enough programming or diversity to produce a constant cash inflow.
Sure, there would be a huge boost to begin with UNTIL subscribers watch all the newer content that they want for a few months and then they would go away.
Once again, in my opinion.
A MUCH better constant revenue producer is what they are offering now which is the "specials", 10 for or 20 for but no more than that.
The 99 for, IMO, was, and is, a bad idea as it most likely produced "one time" income and that's the end of that customer.
Without either live programming or an immense selection of newer movies and TV series then a monthly subscription rate will produce a "BOOOOM" as KT likes to say, but not a long term cash producer.
(2)
(0)
