Quote:

---

IR,

I would like to ask a question as to the strategy that is being employed with regard to TPAC. A number of shareholders, including myself, are rather confused as to why there is a "moratorium," if you will, on issuing news releases regarding TPAC's developments until 2017. There are scam companies that issue fluff PRs every time one turns around. TPAC, from what we can see, is not a scam company. (Scam companies would not and could not obtain NAVAIR certification or Boeing authorized supplier status.)

I'm not suggesting a barrage of PRs. However, and here is my question (in several parts), aren't SLAs with Hong Kong and Australian entities worthy of a PR? Can you elaborate on the rationale behind this strategy? How will "new blood" be attracted to TPAC without PRs? Right now, TPACmuse is preaching to the choir, aka the current long shareholders. Don't you think the share price would be boosted by new investors/traders?

I look forward to your reply. Thank you very much.

Sincerely,

---