Posted On: 06/22/2016 12:02:56 PM
Post# of 7798
There you go, pulling the same crap you always pull. Saying whatever you want and them backing it up with information that does not say what you say it says. AKA lying.
First of all a person is not a ship so that analogy is false.
Second, the statute you posted does not say the ship must be "named" in order to get a recovery permit. It says "existence and nature of a historic shipwreck site has been documented" meaning find enough to date it approximately and know that it is a wreck of some sort that is not military but is historic.
Thirdly, the Juno permit does not predate the rule change from 2009. The Juno permit was granted in 2011.
First of all a person is not a ship so that analogy is false.
Second, the statute you posted does not say the ship must be "named" in order to get a recovery permit. It says "existence and nature of a historic shipwreck site has been documented" meaning find enough to date it approximately and know that it is a wreck of some sort that is not military but is historic.
Thirdly, the Juno permit does not predate the rule change from 2009. The Juno permit was granted in 2011.
(5)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
