Posted On: 06/17/2016 11:57:06 PM
Post# of 65629
P-HOT. Use what's left of your addled head.
Expanding gun background checks to those on watch lists simply makes sense.
And your analogy to armed protection of government officials is about as stupid as it gets. Part of the reason they need protection
is because of stupid loopholes that allow the wrong people to get guns.
As I said, watch next week and see which Party fairs bests with their arguments on the proposed Bills.
dummies like you can conflate reasonable expansion of background checks with imaginary 'disarming' of legal gun owners, but that's the kind of nonsense that only oh so easily frightened idiots as you fall for. Grow up, grow a pair.
Expanding gun background checks to those on watch lists simply makes sense.
And your analogy to armed protection of government officials is about as stupid as it gets. Part of the reason they need protection
is because of stupid loopholes that allow the wrong people to get guns.
As I said, watch next week and see which Party fairs bests with their arguments on the proposed Bills.
dummies like you can conflate reasonable expansion of background checks with imaginary 'disarming' of legal gun owners, but that's the kind of nonsense that only oh so easily frightened idiots as you fall for. Grow up, grow a pair.
(0)
(0)
