Posted On: 06/17/2016 1:48:07 AM
Post# of 72436
![Avatar](https://investorshangout.com/images/ProfileImages/424989898_3046_Avatar jpeg2.jpg)
Soft bashing article posted elsewhere, purporting to describe the dismissal of Rosen's BS shareholder suit, but stating things in a way that slyly implied CTIX actually should not have prevailed -- all I can say is, when you see someone claiming to do analysis of a lawsuit on a website purporting to have to do with the law, and the author writes " he had went to....." -- well, you know how seriously to take it.
Amusing that grammatically-challenged posters elsewhere would post a grammatically-challenged article filled with innuendo.
Wouldn't it be interesting to know if someone from the Rosen firm was interviewed, or placed that article, or wrote that article?
I'm deliberately not linking to BS, so please don't ask for the link.
Amusing that grammatically-challenged posters elsewhere would post a grammatically-challenged article filled with innuendo.
Wouldn't it be interesting to know if someone from the Rosen firm was interviewed, or placed that article, or wrote that article?
I'm deliberately not linking to BS, so please don't ask for the link.
![](/m/images/thumb-up.png)
![](/m/images/thumb-down.png)