People can argue semantics and very narrow legal definitions that defy common usage when they try to defend the indefensible. When the Vice President of the United States refers to her as a rape victim, I think we can safely assume that most people regard the person who put her in that traumatic situation as being a rapist.

I suppose now we'll get one of your other identities start arguing on your behalf now. You've admitted to having at least 5 of them.

No more about this. You've stated your position, I've stated mine. Reasonable people can draw their own conclusions.