Posted On: 06/11/2016 2:24:58 PM
Post# of 15187
Re: Goodspeed65 #6132
GS agreed. my post was just to catch all people on my r/s scenario that was based on either no buyback or a smaller buyback.
I think a lot just ran with the notion of a r/s, that it would be done soon or at a low pps-effectively burying all investors.
Again, it was a hypothetical situation based on limited knowledge of company details.
My post was merely to update new readers or those that only saw r/s and did not follow the remaining reasons it could/should happen at a certain time.
I think people are not taking into account that it is way in the future, after this company is firing on all cylinders and the pps is well above anybody buy in price.
I was merely trying to catch the new reader to the thread up.
TS.
I think a lot just ran with the notion of a r/s, that it would be done soon or at a low pps-effectively burying all investors.
Again, it was a hypothetical situation based on limited knowledge of company details.
My post was merely to update new readers or those that only saw r/s and did not follow the remaining reasons it could/should happen at a certain time.
I think people are not taking into account that it is way in the future, after this company is firing on all cylinders and the pps is well above anybody buy in price.
I was merely trying to catch the new reader to the thread up.
TS.
(1)
(0)
Scroll down for more posts ▼