Investors Hangout Stock Message Boards Logo
  • Home
  • Mailbox
  • Boards
  • Favorites
  • Whats Hot!
  • Login - Join Now!
Political Debate Board
Posted On: 05/31/2016 1:50:16 PM
Post# of 65629
Posted By: Bhawks
Re: cashclan #10564
I'm not certain what part of "In fact, Dulles was never authorized to make such an offer and there is no hard evidence that he did so." is not clear to you, but no hard evidence is what it is.

Quote:
.......using two or three tactical nuclear weapons against these enemy positions".

Bidault declined, he says, "because he knew… that if this killed a lot of Viet Minh troops then it would also basically destroy the garrison itself".




'Tactical' NOT 'strategic', which are commonly referred to a 'city busters'.

So if Dulles was casually throwing around a 'suggestion' it wasn't viewed as practical.

(0)
(0)









  • New Post - Investors HangoutNew Post

  • Public Reply - Investors HangoutPublic Reply

  • Private Reply - Investors HangoutPrivate Reply

  • Board - Investors HangoutBoard

  • More - Investors HangoutMore

  • Keep Post - Investors HangoutKeep Post
  • Report Post - Investors HangoutReport Post
  • Home - Investors HangoutHome
  • Mailbox - Investors HangoutMailbox
  • Boards - Investors HangoutBoards
  • Favorites - Investors HangoutFavorites
  • Whats Hot! - Investors HangoutWhats Hot!
  • Settings - Investors HangoutSettings
  • Login - Investors HangoutLogin
  • Live Site - Investors HangoutLive Site